Articles
 Translation Breakdown
 Translation Consequences
 Translation Limitations
 A Translation Mandate
 A Translation Issue
 Vulnerability Defined
 A Vulnerability
 So what does that mean?
 The Consequent Difference of John
 So What is John?

Series [All]
 Administration
 Confessions of a Jewish Skeptic (4)
 Exploring Translation Theories (25)
 Leaving the Jewish Fold (3)
 Memory and Identity
 Religion and Cultural Memory (51)
 The Creative Word (19)
 The Cross-Cultural Process (7)
 The Oral Gospel Tradition (4)
 We the People (8)

Archive
 

Wednesday, 20 April 2016
Analysis

Siting Translation: History, Post-Structuralism and the Colonial Context,
Tejaswini Niranjana, University of California Press, 2015, page 35

If history has been rewritten by a dominating 'colonial' power, then how do we read the "effective text"? Niranjana explains that this means asking questions such as:

Who uses or interprets the text? How is it used and for what? Both the critique of representation and the critique of historicism empower the post-colonial theorust to undertake an analysis of what Homi Bhabha (following Foucault) has called technologies of colonial power.

This addresses the problem of translation and allows a critical examination of 'representation and reality' to take place. Where is there evidence of a text having been rewritten by a translator's (or a translator's patron) 'colonial' discourse, so as to render the common understanding in a different way to that in which it is understood by the text's rightful owners. And if the text is then not a written text, but a cultural tradition or a religious conviction ...

Posted By Jonathan, 8:00am Comment Comments: 0