Articles
 Translation Breakdown
 Translation Consequences
 Translation Limitations
 A Translation Mandate
 A Translation Issue
 Vulnerability Defined
 A Vulnerability
 So what does that mean?
 The Consequent Difference of John
 So What is John?

Series [All]
 Administration
 Confessions of a Jewish Skeptic (4)
 Exploring Translation Theories (25)
 Leaving the Jewish Fold (3)
 Memory and Identity
 Religion and Cultural Memory (51)
 The Creative Word (19)
 The Cross-Cultural Process (7)
 The Oral Gospel Tradition (4)
 We the People (8)

Archive
 

Tuesday, 8 March 2016
Christian Teaching III

Seeing Judaism Anew: Christianity's Sacred Obligation,
Ed. Mary C. Boys, Rowman and Littlefield, 2002
Chapter 14, "Covenant and Conversion" (pp. 163-174), page 165

The next step in Joann Spillman's argument addresses revelation:

Christians affim that G-d has acted to reveal who G-d is and what G-d wills.

While admitting that even the concept or means of revelation is not uniformly agreed between the various denominations, she continues:

Christians, however, generally agree that revelation happens at G-d's own initiative. Revelation is analogous to interpersonal communication: G-d meets us person too person. G-d is a someone, not a something. Furthermore, revelation of G-d is always revelation of mystery; even as G-d communicates, G-d remains mystery to us.

This is an important point because:

We must be careful not to describe revelation in away that suggests the Christians have a clearer way of knowing G-d that we actually have.

In other words, we cannot pretend to have or to know more that we do. Our understanding, being finite, of the infinite in necessarily limited - if in no other respect - to essentially a finite 'slice' of G-d.

Posted By Jonathan, 9:00am Comment Comments: 0