Articles
 Translation Breakdown
 Translation Consequences
 Translation Limitations
 A Translation Mandate
 A Translation Issue
 Vulnerability Defined
 A Vulnerability
 So what does that mean?
 The Consequent Difference of John
 So What is John?

Series [All]
 Administration
 Confessions of a Jewish Skeptic (4)
 Exploring Translation Theories (25)
 Leaving the Jewish Fold (3)
 Memory and Identity
 Religion and Cultural Memory (51)
 The Creative Word (19)
 The Cross-Cultural Process (7)
 The Oral Gospel Tradition (4)
 We the People (8)

Archive
 

Thursday, 19 November 2015
Clothing

The second non-distinction on Cohen's list is clothing:

Clothing is an extesion of identity. Roman clothing was distinctive, and the Roman magistrate who wore Greek clothing in publis was subject to ridicule, at least in Republican times ... Jews did not wear distinctive Jewish clothing ... Archaeological finds from the Bar Kokhba period reveal that the Jews of Palestine in the first and second century CE wore clothing that was indistinguishable from non-Jews.

Even veils, worn by some Jewish women, were apparently worn by many women in the eastern Roman empire, so Cohen says:

I know of no evidence for the easy recognisability of Jews, either male or female, in antiquity.

Indeed, he goes on, there is much evidence that Jews were not easily distinguished from Gentile. Even religious items - such as tzitzit and teffilin - were not worn in public. He concludes:

Jews were not distinctive either by their looks or by their clothing. Jews of Antioch looked Antiochene; Jews of Alexandria looked Alexandrian; Jews of Ephesus looked Ephesian and the Jews of Rome looked just like another exotic group from the East.

Posted By Jonathan, 9:04am Comment Comments: 1
 
 

Thursday, 19 November 2015
Comment -

Understandable ... can't show your separate when you've just been defeated by another society!

Posted By Harry Steck 03:28am