Articles
 Translation Breakdown
 Translation Consequences
 Translation Limitations
 A Translation Mandate
 A Translation Issue
 Vulnerability Defined
 A Vulnerability
 So what does that mean?
 The Consequent Difference of John
 So What is John?

Series [All]
 Administration
 Confessions of a Jewish Skeptic (4)
 Exploring Translation Theories (25)
 Leaving the Jewish Fold (3)
 Memory and Identity
 Religion and Cultural Memory (51)
 The Creative Word (19)
 The Cross-Cultural Process (7)
 The Oral Gospel Tradition (4)
 We the People (8)

Archive
 

Tuesday, 8 September 2015
Moveable Standards?

Identity and the Politics of Scholarship in the Study of Religion,
ed. José Ignacio Cabezón & Sheila Greeve Davaney, Routledge, 2004, page 15

Even standards themselves are, apparently, not fixed. Several contributors note that academic standards are not neutral or value-free. Davaney asserts:

standards of good scholarship are themselves socially constructed and therefore contestable and revisable. As such they do not embody some transhistorical or timeless norms but are reflective of the judgements and values of their time and place.

We should probably be relieved at that. All of us have read some historical work - scholarly, popular or even fiction - and shuddered, thinking, "That is so 'fifties'!" or whatever. We move on; the world moves on. It is against that backdrop that Davaney rightly says:

It becomes no less imperative to examine what values, commitments and forms of power shape academic criteria that to interrogate therole of identity in shaping scholarly agendas and claims.

Posted By Jonathan, 8:04am Comment Comments: 0