Articles
 Translation Breakdown
 Translation Consequences
 Translation Limitations
 A Translation Mandate
 A Translation Issue
 Vulnerability Defined
 A Vulnerability
 So what does that mean?
 The Consequent Difference of John
 So What is John?

Series [All]
 Administration
 Confessions of a Jewish Skeptic (4)
 Exploring Translation Theories (25)
 Leaving the Jewish Fold (3)
 Memory and Identity
 Religion and Cultural Memory (51)
 The Creative Word (19)
 The Cross-Cultural Process (7)
 The Oral Gospel Tradition (4)
 We the People (8)

Archive
 

Sunday, 28 June 2015
What's in a name?

Conflict and Identity in Romans: The Social Setting of Paul's Letter,
Philip F. Esler, Fortress Press, 2003, page 12

'Jews' or 'Judeans' is not the only name choice that Esler deprecates.

The need to be accurate in designating identitis, even if they are not ethnic, also demands that we eschew the word 'Christian' in relation to first-century CE phenomena. The Greek word 'Christianos' appears only three times in the New Testament (Acts 11:26, 26:28; 1 Peter 4:16). It is the Greek version of 'Christianus' that was coined by speakers of Latin, among whom the suffix '-ianus' classified people as partisans of a political or military leader, and is mildly contemptuous. An apt translation is "Christ-lackey". It does nor appear to have been used as a self-designation by the group until after the NewTestament period.

Should we be prepared to follow suit and follow Esler's preferred identities as "Christ-follower" or "Christ-believer"? Given the adoption of JBY (Jewish Beliver in Yeshua) as a scholarly term, would we object to GBJ?

Posted By Jonathan, 8:00am Comment Comments: 0