Justice for All
 Church in Decline
 Striking Similarity
 The Efficacy of Prayer
 Are You Ready for Change?
 A Question of Vocation
 The Challenge of Change
 Elul 24
 Elul 23
 Elul 22

Series [All]
 Elul 5777 (9)
 Exploring Translation Theories (25)
 Live Like You Give a Damn
 Memory and Identity
 The Creative Word (19)
 The Cross-Cultural Process (7)
 The Old Testament is Dying
 The Oral Gospel Tradition (4)
 We the People (8)


Wednesday, 27 May 2015

Objectivity, Lack of Bias

Interviewing for Education and Social Science Research: The Gateway Approach,
Carolyn Lunsford Mears, Palgrave/Macmillan, 2009, page 27

Given that the Gateway Approach is carried out by a researcher who has an 'inside' position, this must be a problem. Mears explains:

In any research project, whatever the methodology, the potential for subjectivity exists, and in interview-based research, a personal incination to a particular point of view could introduce a bias that would make the research of dubious worth.

How can this be countered? Mears suggests:

Instead of asserting that it is possible to achieve a distanced objectivity, it seems more productive to proceed from a position of reflection, candour and disclosure.

Also refered to as positionality, it is important for the researcher to disclose their position so that readers of the research can calibrate or allow for the original researcher's point of view.

Posted By Jonathan, 8:11am Comment Comments: 1

Wednesday, 27 May 2015
Comment -

Yes. And it also makes a difference if the researcher is coming to a point of view or whether he/she starts with that viewpoint and is endeavouring to establish it.

I'm not so sure that there is much of a difference in either case between the insider or the outsider. The latter may try to say he is less biased by virtue of being an outsider, but that doesn't appear to me to hold much water.

Posted By Timothy Butlin 08:29am