Justice for All
 Church in Decline
 Striking Similarity
 The Efficacy of Prayer
 Are You Ready for Change?
 A Question of Vocation
 The Challenge of Change
 Elul 24
 Elul 23
 Elul 22

Series [All]
 Elul 5777 (9)
 Exploring Translation Theories (25)
 Live Like You Give a Damn
 Memory and Identity
 The Creative Word (19)
 The Cross-Cultural Process (7)
 The Old Testament is Dying
 The Oral Gospel Tradition (4)
 We the People (8)


Wednesday, 18 March 2015


Exclusion and Embrace: Theological Exploration of Identity, Otherness and Reconciliation,
Miroslav Volf, Abingdon Press, 1996, page 99

Switching now from his basic chapters on 'exclusion' to start looking at 'embrace', Volf examines what he says is the fallacy of the "there is no choice" argument.

In all wars, whether large or small, whether carried out on battlefields, city streets, living rooms or faculty lounges, we come across the same basic exclusionary polarityL "us against them", "their gain - our loss", "either us or them". The stronger the conflict, the more the rich texture of the social world disappears and the stark exclusionary polarity emerges around which all thought and practice aligns itself.

Volf maintains it is necessary to get out of that whole social order to avoid being sucked into the morass. The dichotomy is false, Volf explains, because

to destroy the other rather than be destroyed oneself is itself a choice.

Volf claims that it is possible to resist the vortex of mutual exclusion, to relocate common ground and existence and re-engage in embrace rather then destruction.

Posted By Jonathan, 9:00am Comment Comments: